Daily notes and commentary -- Week 05* Link to: last modified 06 Feb MM at 19:15 GMT+1.
Associated links:
Earlier weeks, see the Daynotes index. |
© |
Monday 31 January(morning note) Analysts are starting to wonder if the e-commerce sector is headed for a serious shake-out. The most recent ripple in the pond was amazon.com announcing a 150 job cutback. This was the first layoffs since it went online in 1995. Predictably, shares fell sharply (8%), but perhaps more ominous is that since December, amazon stocks are down all of 42%. Investors are apparently growing increasingly impatient with the take-no-profits attitude that amazon has consistently held. Across the board, e-commerce retailers are down, reporting dismal figures and large job cuts. Well, from what I hear, this was in part due to significant customer disappointments with both delivery capacity and customer care-less during the e-hyped holiday season.
(night update) Well! That was a mixed day. First off, it was windy. Very windy, which does things to my concentration. Then a number of family things to distract. Delivery of a W2Kpro and server release version, thank you kindly (I've been running beta 3 for far too long...). And finally NT BSOD. I'll detail this last here for future reference, so bear with me (or skip ahead). Background: I was going to use PartitionMagic 4 to look at the external SCSI that inexplicably dropped out of Windows vision. As I discovered, I never had re-installed PM4 on NT4 after a major NT crash I suffered last summer (22 July). The only working copy was on Win95. Rather than reboot, I installed from the CD. Ok, that didn't work as expected, because PM did fault and die whenever it tried to write partition data to the SCSI. Weird. After a couple of tries, I gave up, and thought maybe a reboot would help. Ok, I got into kernel and BSOD'd on this:
My, that was helpful. Well, I worried at this bone a while, but restarts did nothing except land me in the same dead-end. Looking at the system partition (FAT) from Win95 did not make me any more enlightened, since nothing appeared wrong. I found no relevant logs to study either. Rescue disk was out, because this NT incarnation had never been able to create one (diskette too small). In any case, I'm not sure I could have done anything sensible from it. Ok, next step was to wonder if the installer on CD, which has a repair option, could do anything. Fine, it trundled a long while, loading the setup files, and asked for reboot so it can run its own kernel. Now I saw the expected installer item on the loader menu, and saw the expected installer item on the loader menu, and saw the expected installer item on the loader menu, and saw... WTF? The loader was looping endlessly back to the menu. I rebooted a couple of times, but that was it. After a long series of loops, I managed to read the single quickly flashed line between menu screens:
Now what? I redid the install a few times, but each time, I got stuck at the endlessly looping menu. This was getting ridiculous, and rather worrying. I could not repair or re-install from CD. Would I need to wipe both C and D, and then re-install everything on the system from scratch? All my data seemed safe enough on the other partitions, but at the very least, this was looking to consume the rest of the day. I took time off to run some errands and mull options. Later I got back to the system a few times, but nothing significant suggested itself. I manually ripped out the install files and restored the original BOOT.INI. And quite by accident, I let a reboot into Win95 go by the menu default, so that I instead came up in NT boot. Oops. But strangely, no BSOD. I came up into login, and then desktop. Things were not normal however, since numerous alerts came up and several startup programs stalled. The most serious was that I was warned that there was no swap file defined (my main NT swap was on dedicated F).. Twiddling with this consumed more time -- several reboots all ended up the same, but at least I was no longer looping in the boot menu. Clueless maybe, but progress of sorts. I did determine that I had only C and D visible to NT -- Now THAT was worrying, because most of my apps and all my data reside on E, G etc. But it did explain where all those alerts were coming from. In due time, I figured out that I had to go into the drive manager and reinstate the drive letters for the invisible, but thankfully still present partitions above D. A final reboot at close to midnight to see that the system was back. Phew! I don't know what happened, and I don't know what resolved the loop problem or messed up the drive letters, but I do know I was very happy to get back the working system. That's quite enough Windows for today, is my considered opinion. Ok, now that's been written, and you know how I spent the day. Back to serious matters <g>, like sleep. Good night all.
|
© |
Tuesday 1 FebruaryMy system started up normally this morning, so I must have somehow got things back together again last night. I can only note that fixing things in Windows does not necessarily make you any wiser. Gary Berg had some feedback on drive handling in Windows, see the wiki page. Gray and rainy. Not terribly inspiring, and daughter is home sick so I need to multitask more than I feel up to. Recent news flashes...
The daynoter backchannel had some off-the-wall topics lately, apropos which
I found this interesting
crapper
link
Dan Seto
notes on his page the Illinois Execution
Moratorium. Yes indeed, when a state
As for Brian Bilbrey's
experience with (later) Important correction to my hasty comment above. Thanks for spotting that, Dan.
|
© |
Wednesday 2 FebruaryToday's quoted wisdom...
Various items in passing...
Much to write, little time to do it. I can hardly credit that we're into February. We'll have to see if the kids are in school tomorrow.
|
© |
Thursday 3 February
Sorry, but this update for wazzamatter, cat eat your mouse<q First, I don't use a mouse, you lazy cat. Second, get out of the way with your penciltip trying to type while I'm updating! Little of import to report, as I was in my few moments of focus looking at the accounts for 1999. Cooking the books, some call it <g>. The more fine-mannered call it creative accounting. Me, I just enter the numbers as they come. No big deal. For once I intend doing all the sums ahead of deadline. NT system still ticking along, so I must have somehow cleared up that problem I reported earlier this week.
|
© |
Friday 4 FebruaryI figure the mating season for Japanese cars must have started. Seems the simplest reason to explain why there were so many tailgaters this morning. And I mean tailgating -- one after another sniffing like dogs right up to my exhaust pipe as I drove Edward to school. In fact some of these small cars were so close that usually the only indication I had was there was the reflected headlight glare on the back window. Since we drive a VW Coach minibus, smaller cars are so much lower that they can disappear in that rear blind zone if they are close enough. Sheesh... Even a light tap on the brake pedal didn't much discourage the drivers from being that close. Oh well, our car wasn't in heat, so eventually each tailgater zoomed off after better prospects. Local news, the Swedish way...
Silicon Valley defined: if you stay put long enough to have business cards that aren't at least slightly out of date, then you're not a player. I've (again) been reading some recent material about Internet domains and trademark issues. The whole issue clearly became infected when the "cybersquatters", who registering hundreds or even thousands of domains, tried selling them for vastly inflated prices to companies that were slow to realize that they ought to have brandname domains for their Internet presence. Given this, it's perhaps not too surprising that companies play legal hardball when it comes to securing what they rightly or wrongly feel is "their trademark". Sadly, it is as usual the innocent third parties that suffer for it. Unfare, n. The dollar you owe a cab driver before you've even moved a foot.
Need something new to worry about? Geologists say there is a real risk that sooner or later a "supervolcano" will erupt with devastating force, sending temperatures plunging on a hemispheric or even global scale. When a supervolcano goes off, it is an order of magnitude greater than a normal eruption. It produces energy equivalent to an impact with a comet or an asteroid. So who said life was safe? But clearly, there are ample hints that the long term future of our civilization depends on not keeping all our gene pool and knowledge base in the same basket, i.e. Earth. I suppose a good case could be made for the condition that in general successful civilizations must pass a number of development thresholds fast enough so that random (or periodic) planetary catastrophes don't finish them off first.
Hmm, my primary ISP connectivity has been dying on the 3rd outbound hop on and off during part of the day. Good thing I kept a backup dial-up account alive -- no problems there. It's slightly slower, but not by much. (Journalism) is intrinsically unfair. Into the monstrous citadel of central government, the press can do no more than lob an occasional severed head or putrid carcass. -- Simon Jenkins, the Sunday Times (UK).
|
© |
Saturday 5 February(There were things added last night, but I went into hibernate mode before I posted... thus the seemingly malplaced update anchor for today.) Anyway, on the subject of piracy, it's perfectly true that (as with smuggling), the best and pretty much only way to prevent it is to make it not worth the effort. And the best way to do that is to ensure that the original commodity is so cheap and easy to get that copying or smuggling is more expensive and more of a bother than simply buying. Copying should in any case be freely possible for personal backups and such. So why isn't this already the case? For the most part I would guess that it is because the big companies are still applying the old physical copy paradigm to information age commodities. As has been pointed out many times before with regards to e-books and copyright, the current paradigm is based on mass-produced printed copy strongly tied to revenue per copy. Xerox almost, but not quite displaced this paradigm by offering cheap and good quality copying. Even so, there was ample misuse of physical-copy accounting by resellers, e.g. bookshop returns of book or magazine covers of "unsold copies), while in fact selling the actual book copies as "damaged". Once we have a good, ubiquitous, and transparent micropayment system in place on the Internet, things will change. The new paradigm will be impossible to resist. In fact we see indications that the big companies are aware of this and are in various ways trying to find or create places for themselves, however artificial, as proprietary content providers/resellers.
The legal contortions applied to information commoditization are remarkable, entertaining, and occasionally scary when they hurt people. Some of the current issues:
Shades of Mission Impossible... SpectraDisc, in Providence, Rhode Island, is working on self-destructing DVD disks. A special material is used to coat the disks, and when you start to play them, the laser light exposure causes this material to begin to turn blue, eventually blocking the player's ability to read the disk. Research is fine-tuning this to allow viewing content a pre-determined time (hours to days). The coating technology could be applied to other optical discs, e.g. music CDs, Sony discs and CD-ROMs. I am sure someone will figure out a way around this if it begins to be used. As it happens, even the proposed resellers of such a scheme seem less than thrilled at "throwaway disks". There are also environmental aspects not yet addressed.
And finally, the issue about
unauthorized
transfer of
fire
|
© |
Sunday 6 February* Helpful advice...(haha, do I detect wishful thinking?) Microsoft has anticipated that some might want to remove Linux at some time. Here are some step-by-step instructions Uniform Computer Transactions Act (UCITA). The software industry is leveraging its favored status among lawmakers to push US state legislation that cuts consumer and business customer rights. The proposed bills would:
Wicked new terms indeed, and if passed in many states, this may be yet another factor that will ultimately push many users into Linux and open source.
Web Users Should Not Engage in Promiscuous Browsing This heading is apropos the "malicious script" and "poisoned cookie" threat. Sound obscure? A couple of simple examples of links that pose a threat are:
In either case, the user only sees "Click here" as a link anchor. Both assume that the user's browser will run scripts. The first example runs the inserted script code in whatever context the user establishes with the server. The second pulls in extra material from an untrusted site. Links like this can appear in email, newsgroup or website contexts that look perfectly innocent, and point to otherwise trusted sites. Unless you see the source, you have no way of knowing that the link itself is carrying the malicious code. Because the malicious scripts are executed in a context that appears to have originated from the targeted site, the attacker has full access to the document retrieved (depending on the technology chosen by the attacker), and may send data contained in the page back to their site. Additionally, a hacker can trick a server program to execute in an inappropriate security context with inappropriate privileges. Especially vulnerable are web forms, which through embedded form tags can be subverted even when scripts are disabled.
More info
here
Local Swedish news...
Have a good weekend people. Thanks for your email.
|
© |
All rights reserved. Copyright MM Bo Leuf. |