Daily notes and commentary -- Week 52* Link to: last modified 2 Jan MM at 20:32 GMT+1. The update-link (above) points to where I last added some text -- I have so far not implemented a current-entry page, nor a day per page, but instead stayed with the week-per-page format. Associated links:
Earlier weeks, see the Daynotes index. |
© |
Monday 27 DecemberThe rain goes on... Cental Europe got the worst of the storm this time however, described yesterday as tornado-strength winds in places. Talk about blowing out the old... Too much "2000" and "Y2K" around these days, so I think I'll use the Roman numeral "MM" form instead. Shorter. More, mmm... thought provoking, mm? Family spend part of the afternoon walking about town. Rather little of the expected post-Christmas sales, so we didn't spend anything on such. Came home to find the cat sitting smugly in my office chair and a message on the screen that I at first did not credit, but after some fruitless attempts to log in had to concede -- the cat has changed all the passwords and degraded my user identity to that of "guest". Claw on my data jugular as it were. I am updating this under constraint and must allow Salem full Internet access at any time. Oops, time is up for my part.
haha, i've come out of hiding and now rule the web<e pity the "salem" domains are already taken, but i'll figure something out. quick, get me some tuna, lakey, no no not the catfood tin, the real stuff<e
|
© |
Tuesday 28 Decemberoho, salem.gov -- now that domain has promise, but really it should be the other way around -- gov.salem -- after all why not my own tld just to make sure that the message gets across<q the family here got some time off for good behavior so they've been off somewhere shooting 8-ball and no doubt crafting incompetent plans. i had the isp connection to myself at least. a daynoter sent around a humorous thing starting 'if ibm made toasters...' which of course reminded me that i do need to get a toaster line installed here, so i can reach the other realm more directly. myohmy it's going to be a busy new year, nyhehe.
Oh nuts. I thought I could do a massive re-install while the cat is asleep to regain my administrator privs, but I found all the CDs shredded or chewed up. And I don't believe this, but the cat has installed something called DirectHex9 drivers -- haven't a clue what these are, but they sure keep me from tweaking or shutting down the system pretty effectively <yeouch>.
|
© |
Wednesday 29 DecemberYes, Salem, Sir. No, Salem, Sir. Right away, Salem, Sir. ... Feh! A sort of Y2K alert is circulating apropos the fact that many companies with intranet 24/7 servers intend to power down over the new year. The service disruption concern is supposed to be that harddisks which run for extended periods, and are then powered down for any length of time, have a significantly increased risk of "stiction". I.e. they will refuse to spin up again. The recommended procedure is to first do one or more short term shutdowns that park the disks, before the final long term power down. This is supposed to reduce the risk that the head mechanism parks in the same spot that the accumulated lubricant/dirt "grunge" gets deposited in the first parkings.
And this, just in: "Win2K is only faster than NT4 on systems WITH 32Mb
RAM !" See the
full
MS
benchmarks
One of many clearing house sites that will track Y2K events was announced
today. Based in London, the
millennium-center.gov.uk
site Downing Street has by the way confirmed that Mr Blair is supporting moves to create Greenwich Electronic Time (Get), which is being launched on New Year's Day. The idea of Get is to provide a common standard for all electronic commerce around the world. (GMT is not good enough? I read on...) Get is being spearheaded by the Interactive Media in Retail Group (IMRG), a European on-line retail body whose members include IBM, Microsoft Corp, Marks & Spencer and the British Post Office. (hmm) The group plans to sell software tools for synchronizing servers and generating Get timestamps. (Aha. When in doubt about why, just follow the money trail.) Hmm, now just suppose that to do e-biz you will need Get-compliant software, and to get Get, you will need a valid annually license-renewed MS-GUID number... oh dear... Do I smell a rat? (oh, sorry, no, Salem, not literally...) Salem tells me to get real here; no mere mortal can devise such fiendish plans and get away with it. And warlocks are constained by rules, which is why he is the way he is. (Added later: When I asked about demons, Salem got a strange look in his eyes and refused to answer directly. I get the feeling he's holding something back. BTW, Salem doesn't talk, he types, using the erasor end of a pencil -- locally in an editor window -- which is why anti-cat software will never work. Thanks anyways to the loyal readers who send tips about this. I got a few of these despite Salem's new mail filters.)
|
© |
Thursday 30 December
Returning to yesterday's "stiction" story, there has been considerable discussion
about this on the "Daynoter backchannel", the consensus being that it was
a "non-story"
spread by
cnet Edward is working on further programming projects. He is learning about the basic rules of programming, such as:
And so on. Programming can be great fun, as long as you don't insist on believing that your internal model of the logic is necessarily the same as the one the code represents. The first precursor to coming Y2K casualties was the milk this morning. When attempting to add this to the post-breakfast, pre-lunch coffee, I saw that during the night the remaining liter or so had completely failed its best-before roll-over, and had the consistency of poor cottage cheese. So it goes. ew... i saw that milk... gross <e
We seem to need DirectX 7 for a program Edward wants to run, so I went to look for it. It was not included in the beta of W2k, which apparently has a lower version according to the program. While v7.0a was coming in (6+ Mb), I read the fine print about it (like at about 6 pt on the screen...): ... The DirectX installation process will require approximately 50 MB of free space on your hard drive. After installation, the DirectX download will take approximately 15 MB of hard drive space. Yeah, well that figures. Anything from MS tends to "change core components" irreversibly these days.
|
© |
Friday 31 DecemberNew Years Eve. Well, Happy New Year everyone! As the celebrations moved across the Earth during the day, the televised displays from Sydney were especially impressive. I went out with Edward to look for some fireworks suitable for the evening, without breaking the bank as it were. Not many places selling "munitions" this year, reflecting the so-called restrictions introduced after last new year. Oddly enough, this does not seem to have deminished the amount of pre-newyear banging, which has been much more and has gone on for longer than ever before. Prices did seem higher, however, no doubt expressing the sharply reduced competition, but nonetheless I picked out a selection of "SAMs" and fire fountains that may look nice in the dark. I leave you all with best wishes for a Prosperous New Year, and above all Hope...
|
© |
Saturday 1 January, MM21st Century starts here, sort of (actually, like Millennium, not until 2001, but what the hey...) We survived here, so far. I'll let you know what the new century looks like -- as soon as the smoke clears. Possible glitches can of still occur midnight GMT, given that a lot of systems run on this time. Not to mention when business powers up again after the holidays.
So far, the only Y2k bug I've seen here is that a few programs show shortform
dates incorrectly. Their display went from One example is the WS_FTP client, but changing preferences there to 4-digit years gives a correct 2000 date. The smoke cleared in due time, even though some did their best to add to it far into the early dawn hours, but the day here is still gray and grungy. After last night, one almost expected the clouds this morning to be dangling remains of rockets, and the odd shot-down plane or incendiary grilled bird in the back yards (shut up, Salem). Edward's main reaction this morning was the (expected) anticlimactic "it's just another day". I see that thought reflected in a number of postings among the daynoters, who note that all the Y2k worries have apparently come to naught. A fair amount of this non-incident result may be due to the vast amounts of money and time spent to secure critical systems once the potential problem was given priority above all else. But we "knew" already then that much of the media-driven Y2k hysteria was just that -- hysteria, with little basis in fact. That said, throughout 1999 we have had minor glitches of one kind or another as various systems started using date intervals that stretched into 2000. These were rectified in one way or another. But remember we had glitches for other reasons as well. For the rest of this new year, we are likely to experience further annoying but non-critical (we hope) glitches at unexpected moments, some due to Y2k, some due to other reasons. We can also take the long-term perspective, that mankind as a whole is but a glitch in the overall scheme of things <g>.
Some reported Y2k minor glitches:
The Gartner Group predicts that less than 10% of Y2K glitches will occur in the first two weeks of January, with 55% hitting over the rest of the year. "Most Y2K errors are pretty dull," says one expert, Bruce Webster, co-chair of the Washington-based Year 2000 Group. "A program stops working or it makes a bad calculation. None of this means planes falling out of the sky or nuclear meltdowns." He expects the biggest system failures to occur gradually, over a period of days and weeks.
An interesting animated film popped up on the TV this afternoon, quite unexpectedly, and it was only chance that we saw it. Called (in its official release 1995) Arabian Knight, there is more to this one than initially apparent. Highly imaginative visually, the retro late 60s look (sort of reminiscent of Pink Panther and other period classics) is not really that retro -- the innovative animation work was actually started over 30 years ago (as the Thief and the Cobbler) by producer Richard Williams and had a convoluted history leading to its final release. Therefore, although many viewers will perceive it as a clone trying to ride on the success of Disney's Aladin (1992), the true relationship is quite the reverse. Original owner Warner removed producer Williams from the project after budget and time overruns, and the film got essentially nowhere until after Williams completed Who Framed Roger Rabbit? in 1988. The animation work (done by many masters of the art over the years) was then finished, but completely recut by Mirimax with voiceovers and songs, and sort of slid under the door as a summer release, hoping no doubt that nobody would see the inspirational connections to the earlier box-office hit Alladin (Mirimax is owned by Disney). Thankfully, there was no visible attempt to add a genie and a lamp to the remix. I wouldn't mind looking through the film again sometime with the sound turned down, just to properly appreciate the visual comedy, although Vincent Price's rendition of the evil vizier is really excellent. Even in its recut version, this is an enjoyable romp, and it has an actual storyline.
|
© |
Sunday 2 January* Another week into history. Bye bye... It came to pass that we had the video of Contact! (1997) over the weekend. Kind of makes you stop and wonder what the real public reaction would be to a real announcement of proven ET contact. Unusually for such a movie, scientific bloopers and goofs are not rampant -- though of course there are still a few really careless slipups, some of which unfortunately flaw the otherwise impressive opening sequence. I understand that Carl Sagan (and his wife) were very careful to have the science as close to fact as possible. In that respect, he almost but not quite reached the level of say Kubrik's 2001, which he might have come closer to had he not died during production. Most of the movie however lives in following the life and career of the main character, astronomer and SETI researcher Ellie. In this too, the movie is unusual -- the effects are there to serve the story, rather than the other way around. Some are rather subtle, e.g. à la Gump making President Clinton appear to be speachifying relevant to the ET contact issue. Others, of e.g. the machine at work (and of the version that self-destructs) are largely convincing on a first view. In the end, you do realize that this is a long movie (2h25, though I have seen reviews quoting it as 3h...?), perhaps too long for what it delivers. Somehow it does lets the viewer down, quite apart from any plot changes one may detect from the 1985 novel by Sagan. And some say that the novel was written in part to get back at some of the intriguing and double-dealing that Sagan experienced when it came to government funding. A couple of memoriable quotes:
|
© |
All rights reserved. Copyright 1999 Bo Leuf. |